Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Wilmering v. State

Wilmering v. State

272 S.W. 463, 100 Tex. Crim. 169, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 381
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 1925·No. No. 8866.·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

Defendant is under conviction for the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor with punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Defendant is enlarged pending appeal upon a recognizance which does not conform to the requirements of Article 903, C. C. P. By the terms of said article it is necessary that the recognizance or bond show that defendant has beenconvicted. The recognizance in the instant case only recites that the defendant stands charged by indictment with the unlawful transportation of spirituous, vinous, and malt liquors capable of producing intoxication.

Because of the defect in the recognizance it becomes necessary to dismiss the appeal and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilmering v. State, 272 S.W. 463, 100 Tex. Crim. 169, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 381 (Tex. 1925).

272 S.W. 463 (Wilmering v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hendricks v. State
55 S.W.2d 839 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Saladina v. State
32 S.W.2d 465 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Mitchell v. State
32 S.W.2d 199 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Parnell v. State
27 S.W.2d 192 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Cox v. State
5 S.W.2d 521 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Wall v. State
7 S.W.2d 958 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Downs v. State
299 S.W. 648 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Turner v. State
276 S.W. 705 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)