WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. Corsillo
211 S.E.2d 802, 286 N.C. 421, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1238
Opinion
WILMAR, INCORPORATED
v.
Joseph A. CORSILLO.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Welling & Miller, for the defendant.
Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston, for the plaintiff.
Petition of defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 24 N.C.App., 271, 210 S.E.2d 427. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. Corsillo, 211 S.E.2d 802, 286 N.C. 421, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1238 (N.C. 1975).
211 S.E.2d 802 (WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. Corsillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Milner Airco, Inc. v. Morris
433 S.E.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Young v. Mastrom, Inc.
392 S.E.2d 446 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Brooks Distributing Co., Inc. v. Pugh
373 S.E.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
United Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall
370 S.E.2d 375 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1988)
Amdar, Inc. v. Satterwhite
246 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)