WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. Corsillo
211 S.E.2d 802, 286 N.C. 421, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1238
This text of 211 S.E.2d 802 (WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. Corsillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. Corsillo, 211 S.E.2d 802, 286 N.C. 421, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1238 (N.C. 1975).
Opinion
WILMAR, INCORPORATED
v.
Joseph A. CORSILLO.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Welling & Miller, for the defendant.
Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston, for the plaintiff.
Petition of defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 24 N.C.App., 271, 210 S.E.2d 427. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Milner Airco, Inc. v. Morris
433 S.E.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Young v. Mastrom, Inc.
392 S.E.2d 446 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Brooks Distributing Co., Inc. v. Pugh
373 S.E.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
United Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall
370 S.E.2d 375 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1988)
Amdar, Inc. v. Satterwhite
246 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
211 S.E.2d 802, 286 N.C. 421, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilmar-incorporated-v-corsillo-nc-1975.