Wilmar Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

151 A. 377, 8 N.J. Misc. 633, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 113
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided August 2, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

The petitions in these cases are for writs of certiorari to determine the validity of the vacation by the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Camden of a portion of Browning road in that county. Various reasons are urged for the allowance of the writs, and as the facts • presented in the petitions and proofs submitted under the rule to show cause allowed by this court establish that there are legally debatable questions presented, the writs will be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilmar Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 151 A. 377, 8 N.J. Misc. 633, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 113 (N.J. 1930).

151 A. 377 (Wilmar Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perlmutter v. DeRowe
274 A.2d 283 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1971)