Wilma Isaola v. Habitat for Humanity of Dalton-Whitfield & Murray, Inc.
This text of Wilma Isaola v. Habitat for Humanity of Dalton-Whitfield & Murray, Inc. (Wilma Isaola v. Habitat for Humanity of Dalton-Whitfield & Murray, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ September 29, 2014
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15A0123. WILMA ISAOLA v. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DALTON- WHITFIELD & MURRAY, INC.
This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, defendant Wilma Isaola appealed to the superior court. The superior court also ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and Isaola filed this direct appeal from the superior court’s order. We lack jurisdiction. Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Isaola was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Isaola’s failure to follow this procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 09/29/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilma Isaola v. Habitat for Humanity of Dalton-Whitfield & Murray, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilma-isaola-v-habitat-for-humanity-of-dalton-whit-gactapp-2014.