Willys-Overland Co. v. Carr

8 Ohio Law. Abs. 477, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 958
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1930·No. No 2404·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The court finds that there is error prejudicial to the plaintiff in error apparent upon the face of the record in the following, to-wit:

I. Permitting the witness, Dr. Park L. Myers, called on behalf of the plaintiff below, to testify as an expert regarding the claimant’s disease and whether it originated from, or was aggravated or accelerated by, the injury, basing his opinion upon the history of the case obtained by him from the claimant, who was not his patient.

2. That the verdict' and judgment are manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

For the prejudicial errors above stated the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Williams, Lloyd and Richards, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willys-Overland Co. v. Carr, 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 477, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 958 (Ohio Ct. App. 1930).

8 Ohio Law. Abs. 477 (Willys-Overland Co. v. Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Louisiana Pipe Line Co. v. Kennerk
144 N.E.2d 660 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1957)