Willys-Overland Co. v. Carr

Ohio Court of Appeals

Willys-Overland Co. v. Carr

8 Ohio Law. Abs. 477, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 958

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1930

DocketNo 2404

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 477 (Willys-Overland Co. v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willys-Overland Co. v. Carr, 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 477, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 958 (Ohio Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The court finds that there is error prejudicial to the plaintiff in error apparent upon the face of the record in the following, to-wit:

I. Permitting the witness, Dr. Park L. Myers, called on behalf of the plaintiff below, to testify as an expert regarding the claimant’s disease and whether it originated from, or was aggravated or accelerated by, the injury, basing his opinion upon the history of the case obtained by him from the claimant, who was not his patient.

2. That the verdict' and judgment are manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

For the prejudicial errors above stated the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Williams, Lloyd and Richards, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI