WILLYARD v. State
323 S.W.3d 94, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415, 2010 WL 4075766
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, James Willyard, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WILLYARD v. State, 323 S.W.3d 94, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415, 2010 WL 4075766 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
323 S.W.3d 94 (WILLYARD v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Smith
323 S.W.3d 94 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)