Wills v. Whitlock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wills v. Whitlock

219 S.W.3d 305, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 586, 2007 WL 1124584

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2007

DocketWD 66689

StatusPublished

This text of 219 S.W.3d 305 (Wills v. Whitlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wills v. Whitlock, 219 S.W.3d 305, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 586, 2007 WL 1124584 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwane A. Wills, II appeals from the judgment entered in his multi-count suit against his former wife Julie R. Whitlock, Scott and Stephanie Fuemmeler, and the Fuemmelers’ company, Audsley Monument, LLC. Wills’s suit stems from Whit-lock’s transfer by gift of property awarded her when their marriage was dissolved. After a bench trial, the court entered judgment in favor of Wills on his breach of contract claim against Whitlock for which he was awarded damages of $30,000. The judgment on the remaining counts of specific performance, injunction, declaratory judgment, contempt, tortious interference, civil conspiracy, defamation, and prima fa-cie tort was entered in favor of the defendants. Wills now challenges the judgment only as to the counts for tortious interference, civil conspiracy, and prima facie tort. Wills additionally challenges the measure of damages in the breach of contract count and the failure to award him attorneys’ fees.

After a review of the record, this court does not find any error in the trial court’s judgment. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwane A. Wills, II appeals from the judgment entered in his multi-count suit against his former wife Julie R. Whitlock, Scott and Stephanie Fuemmeler, and the Fuemmelers’ company, Audsley Monument, LLC. Wills’s suit stems from Whit-lock’s transfer by gift of property awarded her when their marriage was dissolved. After a bench trial, the court entered judgment in favor of Wills on his breach of contract claim against Whitlock for which he was awarded damages of $30,000. The judgment on the remaining counts of specific performance, injunction, declaratory judgment, contempt, tortious interference, civil conspiracy, defamation, and prima fa-cie tort was entered in favor of the defendants. Wills now challenges the judgment only as to the counts for tortious interference, civil conspiracy, and prima facie tort. Wills additionally challenges the measure of damages in the breach of contract count and the failure to award him attorneys’ fees.

After a review of the record, this court does not find any error in the trial court’s judgment. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 S.W.3d 305, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 586, 2007 WL 1124584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wills-v-whitlock-moctapp-2007.