Wills v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Wills v. State

106 So. 927, 21 Ala. App. 701

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 8, 1925

Docket6 Div. 907.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 927 (Wills v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wills v. State, 106 So. 927, 21 Ala. App. 701 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

*702 BRICKEN, P. J.

The first count of the indictment charged this defendant with the offense of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages1, a part of which was alcohol. When arraigned upon the indictment, for answer thereto the defendant interposed a plea of “guilty,” and upon said plea the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the first count of the indictment. The court thereupon sentenced the accused to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary, and pronounced and entered a judgment of conviction accordingly. Notwithstanding the plea of guilty by defendant, he took an appeal from the judgment of conviction to this court. It is manifest that this appeal is for delay only, as it is upon the record proper, which is without error. The judgment of conviction, appealed from, is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*702 BRICKEN, P. J.

The first count of the indictment charged this defendant with the offense of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages1, a part of which was alcohol. When arraigned upon the indictment, for answer thereto the defendant interposed a plea of “guilty,” and upon said plea the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the first count of the indictment. The court thereupon sentenced the accused to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary, and pronounced and entered a judgment of conviction accordingly. Notwithstanding the plea of guilty by defendant, he took an appeal from the judgment of conviction to this court. It is manifest that this appeal is for delay only, as it is upon the record proper, which is without error. The judgment of conviction, appealed from, is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 927, 21 Ala. App. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wills-v-state-alactapp-1925.