Wills v. Pennington

606 S.W.2d 75, 270 Ark. 706, 1980 Ark. LEXIS 1609
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 15, 1980
Docket80-222
StatusPublished

This text of 606 S.W.2d 75 (Wills v. Pennington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wills v. Pennington, 606 S.W.2d 75, 270 Ark. 706, 1980 Ark. LEXIS 1609 (Ark. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed upon the authority of McFerrin v. Knight, 265 Ark. 658, 580 S.W. 2d 463; Dixon v. Hall, 210 Ark. 891, 198 S.W. 2d 1002. Appellant has failed to demonstrate a clear entitlement to a writ of mandamus. Wells v. Purcell, 267 Ark. 456, 592 S.W. 2d 100 (1979).

Purtle, Stroud & Mays, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells v. Purcell
592 S.W.2d 100 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1979)
Dixon v. Hall, Secretary of State
198 S.W.2d 1002 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1946)
McFerrin v. Knight
580 S.W.2d 463 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
606 S.W.2d 75, 270 Ark. 706, 1980 Ark. LEXIS 1609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wills-v-pennington-ark-1980.