Wills v. Manning

Supreme Court of Georgia

Wills v. Manning

24 S.E.2d 194, 195 Ga. 336, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 491

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 12, 1943

Docket14379.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 24 S.E.2d 194 (Wills v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wills v. Manning, 24 S.E.2d 194, 195 Ga. 336, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 491 (Ga. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Reid, Chief Justice.

1. When the Judgment of a trial court overruling a demurrer to' a declaration is reversed by this court, the plaintiff has the right to offer an amendment to the declaration at any timé before the *337 order is passed making the judgment of this court the judgment of the trial court. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Chaney, 102 Ga. 814 (30 S. E. 437); Cooper v. Portner Brewing Co., 113 Ga. 1 (38 S. E. 347); Milton v. Milton, 195 Ga. 130 (23 S. E. 2d, 411). But “This court can not consider an amendment to a petition, which was offered, not only after the judgment of this court reversing the judgment of the trial court overruling a general demurrer to the petition was made the judgment of the trial court, hut at a subsequent term.” Stanley v. Laurens County Board of Education, 188 Ga. 581, 582 (4 S. E. 2d, 164), and cit.

No. 14379 January 12, 1943. Rehearing denied February 12, 1943.

2. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition, which sought at a subsequent term to set aside the judgment of that court on the remittitur from this court.

A contrary ruling is not required by the decision in Sammons v. Mahers, 186 Ga. 161, 162 (197 S. E. 284), where this court held that “where the remittitur was made the judgment of the superior court at chambers in another county and in vacation, without notice to the plaintiffs or their counsel and without any previous order in term as to such a hearing, and where the plaintiffs at the first term thereafter . . filed a motion to set aside the judgment on these grounds, the court did not err in granting the motion by an order passed in open court.”

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. BelIí, P. J., concurs in the judgment only. *338 Mildred L. Kingloff and Jackson L. Barwick/ioT plaintiffs. G. H. Howard, G. B. Walker, H. E. Edwards, and E. L. Reagan, assistant attorney-general, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reid, Chief Justice.

1. When the Judgment of a trial court overruling a demurrer to' a declaration is reversed by this court, the plaintiff has the right to offer an amendment to the declaration at any timé before the *337 order is passed making the judgment of this court the judgment of the trial court. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Chaney, 102 Ga. 814 (30 S. E. 437); Cooper v. Portner Brewing Co., 113 Ga. 1 (38 S. E. 347); Milton v. Milton, 195 Ga. 130 (23 S. E. 2d, 411). But “This court can not consider an amendment to a petition, which was offered, not only after the judgment of this court reversing the judgment of the trial court overruling a general demurrer to the petition was made the judgment of the trial court, hut at a subsequent term.” Stanley v. Laurens County Board of Education, 188 Ga. 581, 582 (4 S. E. 2d, 164), and cit.

No. 14379 January 12, 1943. Rehearing denied February 12, 1943.

2. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition, which sought at a subsequent term to set aside the judgment of that court on the remittitur from this court.

A contrary ruling is not required by the decision in Sammons v. Mahers, 186 Ga. 161, 162 (197 S. E. 284), where this court held that “where the remittitur was made the judgment of the superior court at chambers in another county and in vacation, without notice to the plaintiffs or their counsel and without any previous order in term as to such a hearing, and where the plaintiffs at the first term thereafter . . filed a motion to set aside the judgment on these grounds, the court did not err in granting the motion by an order passed in open court.”

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. BelIí, P. J., concurs in the judgment only. *338 Mildred L. Kingloff and Jackson L. Barwick/ioT plaintiffs. G. H. Howard, G. B. Walker, H. E. Edwards, and E. L. Reagan, assistant attorney-general, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.E.2d 194, 195 Ga. 336, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wills-v-manning-ga-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack