Wills v. James
134 A. 920, 100 N.J. Eq. 360, 15 Stock. 360, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 568
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wills v. James, 134 A. 920, 100 N.J. Eq. 360, 15 Stock. 360, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 568 (N.J. 1926).
134 A. 920 (Wills v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.