Wills v. Government Employees Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wills v. Government Employees Insurance

242 A.D.2d 304, 661 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8269

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 11, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D.2d 304 (Wills v. Government Employees Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wills v. Government Employees Insurance, 242 A.D.2d 304, 661 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to compel arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated November 15, 1996, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, pursuant to the terms of his policy of automobile liability insurance issued by Government Employees Insurance Company, his motorcycle is not covered by the policy (see, Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Panetta, 187 AD2d 719). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied his petition to compel arbitration. Miller, J. P., Copertino, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to compel arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated November 15, 1996, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, pursuant to the terms of his policy of automobile liability insurance issued by Government Employees Insurance Company, his motorcycle is not covered by the policy (see, Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Panetta, 187 AD2d 719). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied his petition to compel arbitration. Miller, J. P., Copertino, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 304, 661 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wills-v-government-employees-insurance-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack