Wills v. Cleghorn
This text of 110 So. 917 (Wills v. Cleghorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The suit was for the statutory penalty for failure to satisfy the record of a mortgage executed by several mortgagors. The trial resulted in a nonsuit, with a bill of exceptions, because of the sustaining of the defendants’ motion to exclude the notice for satisfaction, because it was not signed by all of the mortgagors. Section 9023 (4898) of the Code; Wilkerson v. Sorsby, 201 Ala. 182, 77 So. 708; Butler Co. v. Brooks, 204 Ala. 195, 85 So. 778; Jowers v. Brown Bros., 137 Ala. 582, 34 So. 827; Jarratt v. McCabe, 75 Ala. 325; Scott v. Fields, 75 Ala. 419; Grooms v. Hannon, 59 Ala. 510; McClendon v. Henderson Land & Development Co., 9 Ala. App. 480, 63 So. 811. See Hamilton v. Hussmann Ref. & Sup. Co., 214 Ala. 376, 108 So. 50, for recent strict construction of this penal statute. The judgment of the' lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 So. 917, 215 Ala. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wills-v-cleghorn-ala-1926.