Willoughby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Willoughby v. State

491 So. 2d 351, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1608, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8967

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 1986·No. No. 85-2645·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal follows the defendant’s sentencing, the trial court having denied his motion to suppress. We find no error in the trial court’s decision, which we affirm. Shapiro v. State, 390 So.2d 344 (Fla.1980). We conclude that the defendant is without standing to raise the constitutional issue that the state attorney’s unreasonable application of Section 893.135(3), Florida Statutes (1985), denied him equal protection. He admitted that he did not have the ability to provide substantial assistance. See Sandstrom v. Leader, 370 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla.1979). See also State v. Stella, 454 So.2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal follows the defendant’s sentencing, the trial court having denied his motion to suppress. We find no error in the trial court’s decision, which we affirm. Shapiro v. State, 390 So.2d 344 (Fla.1980). We conclude that the defendant is without standing to raise the constitutional issue that the state attorney’s unreasonable application of Section 893.135(3), Florida Statutes (1985), denied him equal protection. He admitted that he did not have the ability to provide substantial assistance. See Sandstrom v. Leader, 370 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla.1979). See also State v. Stella, 454 So.2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Willoughby v. State, 491 So. 2d 351, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1608, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8967 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

491 So. 2d 351 (Willoughby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related