Willoughby v. Martin

64 S.E. 490, 6 Ga. App. 154, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 219
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 4, 1909·No. 1550·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The plaintiff in error concedes that the evidence supports the’ verdict, and the only error complained of was the mere failure to charge-that the burden rests upon the plaintiff to establish by a preponderance of the evidence his contentions in the ease. In the absence of a request,, this was not error, especially where the court fully instructed the jury as to the respective contentions and their duty to determine the truth of such contentions from the evidence. Small v. Williams, 87 Ga. 682 (13 S. E. 589); Gunn, v. Harris, 88 Ga. 439 (14 S. E. 593); Powell v. Georgia & Fla. Ry. Co., 121 Ga. 803 (49 S. E. 759).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willoughby v. Martin, 64 S.E. 490, 6 Ga. App. 154, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 219 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

64 S.E. 490 (Willoughby v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waynesboro Planing Mill v. Hargrove
127 S.E. 665 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)