Willoughby v. Martin
This text of 64 S.E. 490 (Willoughby v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error concedes that the evidence supports the’ verdict, and the only error complained of was the mere failure to charge-that the burden rests upon the plaintiff to establish by a preponderance of the evidence his contentions in the ease. In the absence of a request,, this was not error, especially where the court fully instructed the jury as to the respective contentions and their duty to determine the truth of such contentions from the evidence. Small v. Williams, 87 Ga. 682 (13 S. E. 589); Gunn, v. Harris, 88 Ga. 439 (14 S. E. 593); Powell v. Georgia & Fla. Ry. Co., 121 Ga. 803 (49 S. E. 759).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 S.E. 490, 6 Ga. App. 154, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willoughby-v-martin-gactapp-1909.