Willits v. State

46 S.W.2d 328, 119 Tex. Crim. 117, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 36
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 10, 1932·No. No. 14837·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for unlawfully carrying a pistol; punishment, a fine of $100.

The prosecution is upon complaint and information. The complaint [118]*118has no jurat of any officer certifying that same was subscribed and sworn to before him. The complaint is fatally defective. The jurat of some officer authorized by law to administer oaths, is necessary to verify the fact that the complaint was properly sworn to. Scott v. State, 9 Texas App., 434; Robertson v. State, 25 Texas App., 529, 8 S. W., 659; Stalcup v. State, 99 Texas Crim. Rep., 415, 269 S. W., 1044.

The judgment will be reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willits v. State, 46 S.W.2d 328, 119 Tex. Crim. 117, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 36 (Tex. 1932).

46 S.W.2d 328 (Willits v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stalcup v. State
269 S.W. 1044 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Robertson v. State
8 S.W. 659 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1888)