Willistown Twp. v. Main Line Gardens, Pets

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 7, 2016·No. 46 MAL 2016 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF : No. 41 MAL 2016 WILLISTOWN TOWNSHIP, :

:

Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court :

v. :

: :

MAIN LINE GARDENS, INC. AND : COFFMAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, :

:

Petitioners :

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF : No. 42 MAL 2016 WILLISTOWN TOWNSHIP, :

:

Respondents : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court :

v. :

: :

MAIN LINE GARDENS, INC. AND : COFFMAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, :

:

Petitioners :

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF : No. 43 MAL 2016 WILLISTOWN TOWNSHIP, :

:

Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court :

v. :

: :

MAIN LINE GARDENS, INC. AND : COFFMAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, :

:

Petitioners :

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF : No. 44 MAL 2016 WILLISTOWN TOWNSHIP, REPONDENT :

: : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : :

MAIN LINE GARDENS, INC. AND : COFFMAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, :

:

Petitioners :

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF : No. 45 MAL 2016 WILLISTOWN TOWNSHIP, :

:

Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court :

v. :

: :

MAIN LINE GARDENS, INC. AND : COFFMAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, :

:

Petitioners :

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF : No. 46 MAL 2016 WILLISTOWN TOWNSHIP, :

:

Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court :

v. :

: :

MAIN LINE GARDENS, INC. AND : COFFMAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, :

:

Petitioners :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

[41 MAL 2016, 42 MAL 2016, 43 MAL 2016, 44 MAL 2016, 45 MAL 2016 and 46 MAL 2016] - 2

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is as follows:

under Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, where a trial court rules

on post-trial motions and expresses reliance on previously filed briefs that fully argue

the post-trial issues, may an appellate court nevertheless dismiss the appeal for failure

to file an accompanying brief?

[41 MAL 2016, 42 MAL 2016, 43 MAL 2016, 44 MAL 2016, 45 MAL 2016 and 46 MAL 2016] - 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willistown Twp. v. Main Line Gardens, Pets, (Pa. 2016).

Willistown Twp. v. Main Line Gardens, Pets (Willistown Twp. v. Main Line Gardens, Pets) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.