Willis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Willis v. State

577 S.W.3d 522

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 25, 2019

DocketWD 81593

StatusPublished

This text of 577 S.W.3d 522 (Willis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willis v. State, 577 S.W.3d 522 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

*523Sanford J. Willis appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief which claimed that, in light of the holding of State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), his sentence for stealing exceeded the authorized range of punishment for a class A misdemeanor, and there was no factual basis for the plea court to have accepted his guilty plea to the class B felony of stealing because the facts to which he testified only established a class A misdemeanor. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

*523Sanford J. Willis appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief which claimed that, in light of the holding of State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), his sentence for stealing exceeded the authorized range of punishment for a class A misdemeanor, and there was no factual basis for the plea court to have accepted his guilty plea to the class B felony of stealing because the facts to which he testified only established a class A misdemeanor. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 S.W.3d 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-state-moctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack