Willis v. State
931 So. 2d 1059, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11175, 2006 WL 1816261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Willis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14816 →
Opinion
The state concedes that Appellant’s conviction must be reversed and remanded for a new trial because the record was devoid of a written waiver of a jury trial, nor did the record reflect the trial court conducted an inquiry as to whether Appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived jury trial. Tucker v. State, 559 So.2d 218 (Fla.1990); Mickens v. State, 773 So.2d 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hyler v. State, 732 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). All other issues are moot.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willis v. State, 931 So. 2d 1059, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11175, 2006 WL 1816261 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
931 So. 2d 1059 (Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyler v. State
732 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Tucker v. State
559 So. 2d 218 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Mickens v. State
773 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)