Willis v. State

573 So. 2d 449, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 682, 1991 WL 9389
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1991·No. No. 90-01890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s sentence imposed pursuant to the habitual felony offender’ statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). The statute, as amended in 1988, see ch. 88-131, § 6, Laws of Fla., no longer, requires the trial court to specifically find that an enhanced sentence is necessary for the protection of the public. See Proctor v. State, 570 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

We strike the imposition of court costs and attorney’s fees without prejudice to the' state to seek reimposition after proper notice and opportunity to be heard.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willis v. State, 573 So. 2d 449, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 682, 1991 WL 9389 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

573 So. 2d 449 (Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyatt v. State
581 So. 2d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)