Willis v. State

98 So. 321, 19 Ala. App. 495, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 287
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 18, 1923
Docket5 Div. 469.
StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 321 (Willis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willis v. State, 98 So. 321, 19 Ala. App. 495, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 287 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

*496 SAMFORD, J.

There is no bill of exceptions, the appeal being on the record, and on that it is insisted that error exists in the ruling of the court on demurrer to the' first count of the indictment charging that the defendant manufactured whisky. The law making unlawful the act of manufacturing whisky went into effect January 25, 1919; the indictment was returned March 16, 1922. More than-three years having elapsed from the enactment of the statute, and allegation specifying the time was not necessary Laminack v. State, 18 Ala. App. 400, 92 South. 505; Farrister v. State, 18 Ala. App. 390, 92 South. 504.

There is no error in the record. Let the judgment be affirmed. '

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrister v. State
92 So. 504 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Laminack v. State
92 So. 505 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 321, 19 Ala. App. 495, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-state-alactapp-1923.