Willis v. Spivey
This text of Willis v. Spivey (Willis v. Spivey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1180
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GLENN SPIVEY, Trenton Town Clerk and Custodian of Public Records; SHERI M. DAVENPORT, Former Town Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:05-mc-00009-H)
Submitted: April 20, 2006 Decided: April 25, 2006
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court orders
not granting him approval to file a complaint pursuant to the
court’s order enjoining him from filing complaints without prior
approval of the court and denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and
affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Willis v.
Spivey, No. 4:05-mc-00009-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 2005; Feb. 3, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Willis v. Spivey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-spivey-ca4-2006.