Willis v. Spivey

Fourth Circuit

Willis v. Spivey

177 F. App'x 320

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2006·No. No. 06-1180·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court orders not granting him approval to file a complaint pursuant to the court’s order enjoining him from filing complaints without prior approval of the court and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Willis v. Spivey, No. 4:05-mc-00009-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 2005; Feb. 3, 2006). [321]*321We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court orders not granting him approval to file a complaint pursuant to the court’s order enjoining him from filing complaints without prior approval of the court and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Willis v. Spivey, No. 4:05-mc-00009-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 2005; Feb. 3, 2006). [321]*321We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Willis v. Spivey, 177 F. App'x 320 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

177 F. App'x 320 (Willis v. Spivey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.