Willis v. . Smith

Superior Court of North Carolina

Willis v. . Smith

1 N.C. 22

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1789·Published

Opinion

The counsel for the plaintiff relied upon Buller, 228, 254; Salk., 288; 1 Mod., 117; Douglass, 572; Viner Evid., 231, 2, 3, 4. As to what possession evidence of a fee, they produced and relied on the case of Cowper, 595; Buller, 103; Salk., 421. The evidence is perfectly admissible under the circumstances of this case — and the possession is good evidence of a fee till the contrary appear. *Page 34

(23)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The counsel for the plaintiff relied upon Buller, 228, 254; Salk., 288; 1 Mod., 117; Douglass, 572; Viner Evid., 231, 2, 3, 4. As to what possession evidence of a fee, they produced and relied on the case of Cowper, 595; Buller, 103; Salk., 421. The evidence is perfectly admissible under the circumstances of this case — and the possession is good evidence of a fee till the contrary appear. *Page 34

(23)

Willis v. . Smith, 1 N.C. 22 (N.C. Ct. App. 1789).

Pincite

1 N.C. 22 (Willis v. . Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.