Willis v. Ryals

328 So. 2d 475, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14854
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 1976
DocketNo. Z-38
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 328 So. 2d 475 (Willis v. Ryals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willis v. Ryals, 328 So. 2d 475, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14854 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

FULLER, RICHARD S., Associate Judge.

The pre-trial order specified the issues to be submitted to the trier of fact. The [476]*476jury, by its verdict, determined that the boundary between appellants’ and appellees’ property was the old fence line and, in addition, awarded appellees $25.00 damages as a result of appellants’ interference therewith.

There is no basis for upsetting the jury’s findings.

The parties admit that an error exists in the property description contained in the Final Judgment. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court solely for the purpose of correcting this error in the Final Judgment. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(a).

McCORD, Acting C. J., and SMITH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashland Oil & Refining Co. v. State Road Department
343 So. 2d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 So. 2d 475, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-ryals-fladistctapp-1976.