Willis v. Quick

235 A.D. 734

This text of 235 A.D. 734 (Willis v. Quick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willis v. Quick, 235 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order modified by striking therefrom items 1 to 6, inclusive, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. We are of opinion that there is no necessity for the examination of the plaintiff as to matters contained in items 1 to ' 6, inclusive. As to items 7 to 14, inclusive, we are of opinion that the exercise of discretion by the Special Term should not be disturbed. (Oshinsky v. Gumberg, 188 App. Div. 23.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oshinsky v. Gumberg
188 A.D. 23 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-quick-nyappdiv-1932.