Willis v. Quick
235 A.D. 734
Opinion
Order modified by striking therefrom items 1 to 6, inclusive, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. We are of opinion that there is no necessity for the examination of the plaintiff as to matters contained in items 1 to ' 6, inclusive. As to items 7 to 14, inclusive, we are of opinion that the exercise of discretion by the Special Term should not be disturbed. (Oshinsky v. Gumberg, 188 App. Div. 23.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willis v. Quick, 235 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
235 A.D. 734 (Willis v. Quick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oshinsky v. Gumberg
188 A.D. 23 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)