Willis v. Peet
This text of 26 La. Ann. 156 (Willis v. Peet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff seeks to annul a judgment rendered in favor of Peet against the succession of Thomas J. Buck.
Peet is a citizen of the State of Mississippi, and is sought to be brought into court through a curator ad hoe. The succession of Buck has not been made a party. This was necessary. We can not annul a judgment unless all the parties to it are cited.
Plaintiff asks also for damages against the defendant for slander of title, but as this demand could only arise in case the judgment attacked should be declared a nullity, and as we have come to the conclusion that the suit to annul the judgment can not be entertained, because of the want of proper parties, we can not consider the mere incidental demand of damages.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be avoided, annulled and reversed, and that this suit be dismissed as in case of nonsuit, plaintiff to pay costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 La. Ann. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-peet-la-1874.