Willis v. Newman
This text of Willis v. Newman (Willis v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7698
DAVID CHARLES WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NEWMAN, Officer; GOINS; FRANCIS, Sgt.; RANSOM, Officer; LAWSON, Sgt.; KILLINSON, Officer; DOCTOR MUSSELMAN; JENKINS, Lt.; MOORE, Capt.; BRUBAKER, Major,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00422-jlk-mfu)
Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Charles Willis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Charles Willis appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Willis v. Newman, No. 7:08-cv-
00422-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va. July 28, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Willis v. Newman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-newman-ca4-2009.