Willis v. Moore

1 Cl. Ch. 150
New York Court of Chancery·Decided December 15, 1839·Published

Opinion

The Vice Chancellor

said a receiver must be granted in the usual manner; but intimated, that when an execution had-.,been returned unsatisfied, issued to the counties where the defendants resided, and another execution was out in the'fhands of a sheriff of another county, a creditor’s bill could not be filed until the return of such other execution, unless the complainants alleged in their bill, that there were some fraudulent obstructions to the collection of the debt under such execution; or that the property in such county would, in any event, be insufficient to pay the judgment debt. This bill contains both of such allegations, i. e. the original bill contains them, and a receiver must be allowed upon the supplemental bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willis v. Moore, 1 Cl. Ch. 150 (N.Y. 1839).

1 Cl. Ch. 150 (Willis v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.