Willis v. Johnson
This text of 38 Tex. 303 (Willis v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was brought against one Cook for a balance of the purchase money, and to enforce a vendor’s lien on the land in cotroversy.
[312]*312The appellants claimed to be innocent purchasers for a valuable consideration without notice. The jury found that they were purchasers without notice, but that the whole of the consideration paid was Confederate money. On this verdict the court entered judgment and decree for the appellees.
We have never held that Confederate money was a good or valid consideration to support a contract. We have refused to disturb executed contracts, or to enforce executory contracts; but here the appellants, in order to make out their title to the land, must show that they paid a good consideration. This they have not done. The judgment of the District Court is correct, and is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 Tex. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-johnson-tex-1873.