Willis v. Interocean Mgmt
This text of Willis v. Interocean Mgmt (Willis v. Interocean Mgmt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
________________
No. 95-31097 Summary Calendar ________________
DIANE WILLIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
INTEROCEAN MANAGEMENT; ET AL,
Defendants,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, represented by the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Maritime Administrator
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-2701-E _________________________________________________________________ July 30, 1996
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Diane Willis appeals from the dismissal of a complaint
filed under the Suits in Admiralty Act for lack of subject matter
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. jurisdiction. Willis contends that the doctrine of equitable
tolling applies to toll the running of the applicable two-year
statute of limitations period. We have reviewed the record and the
parties’ briefs and AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal for
essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court.
Willis v. Interocean Management, No. 94-CV-2701-E (E.D. La. Oct.
31, 1995).
Further, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Henderson
v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 64 USLW 4362 (1996), which
overturned this court’s reading of the Suits in Admiralty Act
requirement of “forthwith” service, United States v. Holmberg, 19
F.3d 1062 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 482 (1994), comes too
late to help Ms. Willis. The issue in the instant appeal was not
timeliness but equitable tolling, and Henderson does nothing to
undermine the district court’s denial of equitable tolling.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Willis v. Interocean Mgmt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-interocean-mgmt-ca5-1996.