Willis v. Internal Revenue Service
This text of 81 F. App'x 86 (Willis v. Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Rita Colleen Willis, personal representative of the Estate of Arthur R. Tosh, deceased, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her complaint which sought a refund of estate tax. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, finding that the estate did not file a claim for a refund of estate tax within the limitations period prescribed by Internal Revenue Code § 6511(a). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss, filed on January 15, 2003.
We decline to consider issues, raised for the first time on appeal, regarding whether the IRS was equitably estopped by its own alleged misconduct from raising the statute of limitations. See Barcamerica Int’l. USA Trust v. Tyfield Imps., Inc., 289 F.3d 589, 595, n. 6 (9th Cir.2002). Morever, as the district court correctly stated in its order, section 6511 is not subject to equitable tolling. See Brockamp, 519 U.S. at 354.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 F. App'x 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-internal-revenue-service-ca9-2003.