Willis v. Galbreath
42 S.E. 81, 115 Ga. 793, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 594
Opinion
An action of tort, based, upon an alleged malicious abuse of process by the principals named in an attachment bond, can not properly be joined with an action ex contractu upon that bond against them and the person who signed it as surety.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willis v. Galbreath, 42 S.E. 81, 115 Ga. 793, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 594 (Ga. 1902).
42 S.E. 81 (Willis v. Galbreath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LaHatte v. Walton
184 S.E. 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Cantrell v. National Surety Co.
167 S.E. 314 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Piper v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.
154 S.E. 106 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)
Martin v. Newberry
151 S.E. 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Spires v. Spires
117 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Herring v. Smith
82 S.E. 132 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)