Willis v. Dun
1 Wright 130, 1 Ohio Ch. 130
Opinion
There is nothing on this record but the motion to rescind, and the order of the court overruling it. The grounds of the motion, or order, or appointment of the adminstrator, is nowhere disclosed. As there is nothing for the court to act upon, the writ is quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willis v. Dun, 1 Wright 130, 1 Ohio Ch. 130 (Ohio 1832).
1 Wright 130 (Willis v. Dun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Julian v. Kansas City Star Co.
107 S.W. 496 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1908)
Pittsburgh, Allegheny & Manchester Passenger Railway Co. v. McCurdy
8 A. 230 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887)
Beringer v. Meanor's Administrator
85 Pa. 223 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1877)
Meason v. Kaine
67 Pa. 126 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1871)
Musser v. Gardner
66 Pa. 242 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)
Loew v. Stocker
61 Pa. 347 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1869)
Cochran v. Arnold
58 Pa. 399 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1868)
Hite v. Kier
38 Pa. 72 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1860)