Willis v. Department of Transportation
This text of Willis v. Department of Transportation (Willis v. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1612
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JONES COUNTY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; LYNDO TIPPET; CAM MCRAE, as public official; JAY CONVERSE, as private individual and/or their successors; TANDS INCORPORATION, as private individuals and/or their successors,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (4:07-cv-00046-FL)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Scott A. Conklin, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nicole A. Crawford, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to proceed informa pauperis on appeal.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. In
addition, we conclude the appeal is moot because this court
previously adjudicated the merits of the underlying action and
denied in forma pauperis status. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Willis v.
Dep’t of Transp., No. 4:07-cv-00046-FL (E.D.N.C. May 12, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Willis v. Department of Transportation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-department-of-transportation-ca4-2009.