Willis v. . Coleburn

86 S.E. 596, 169 N.C. 669, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 286
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 20, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 596 (Willis v. . Coleburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willis v. . Coleburn, 86 S.E. 596, 169 N.C. 669, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 286 (N.C. 1915).

Opinion

This is an action in the nature of trespass, in which the title to land is put in issue by the pleadings. The jury found that the plaintiff is the owner of the land; that the defendant Coleburn committed trespass thereon to the extent of $1. On a motion to retax the bill of cost, the defendant appealed from the ruling of the clerk to the judge.

It appears that the plaintiff Willis conveyed his interest in the land, pending the suit, to one Gorham, and that the defendant Coleburn conveyed his interest in the land to one J. A. Royall. Both Gorham and Royall, upon their own applications, were made respectively, parties plaintiff and defendant, at March Term, 1913. The case was tried at June Term, 1914, with the result aforesaid.

The trial judge, Daniels, adjudged that the cost of the action "be taxed against the defendants Royall and Coleburn, as the same appears to be due by each respectively." The appeal from the clerk was heard by Judge Connor, who adjudged that, as between the defendants Coleburn and Royall, that Royall is liable for the costs of the action subsequent *Page 758 to his joinder in this suit, but that both defendants are jointly and severally liable to the plaintiffs for all the costs of the action.

We think this ruling correct. The record shows that the defendant Royall came in practically as a substitute for Coleburn, and of his own accord, and that he adopted the answer of his codefendant and made the cause his own. He is, therefore, liable for all the costs of the action, as the title to the land was adjudged against him.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank v. Sauls
110 S.E. 865 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Weil v. . Davis
84 S.E. 395 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E. 596, 169 N.C. 669, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-coleburn-nc-1915.