Willis v. Buchman

199 So. 892, 240 Ala. 386, 132 A.L.R. 1179, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 285
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 27, 1940
Docket3 Div. 319.
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 199 So. 892 (Willis v. Buchman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willis v. Buchman, 199 So. 892, 240 Ala. 386, 132 A.L.R. 1179, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 285 (Ala. 1940).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The holdings of this court and of the Court of Appeals are to the effect that appeals may be dismissed where the questions for decision have become moo.t. Alabama Power Co. v. City of Sheffield, 232 Ala. 53, 166 So. 797; Todd v. Moore, 205 Ala. 451, 88 So. 447; Caldwell v. Loveless, 17 Ala.App. 381, 85 So. 307.

In this case there was an appeal under the statute and in Agricola Furnace Company v. Smith, Ala.Sup., 195 So. 743, 1 there was petition for certiorari, and this decision dpes not determine the question pre- ' sented in the Court of Appeals on the motion to dismiss the appeal and sought to be reviewed here by certiorari.

It results from the foregoing that the petition for certiorari should be and is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for disposition in accordance with the foregoing opinion. The case having become moot by the action of appellee, it should be dismissed by the Court of Appeals at the cost of appellee.

All the Justices concur except LIVINGSTON, J., not sitting.
1

239 Ala. 438.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florence Surgery Center, L.P. v. Eye Surgery Center of Florence, LLC
121 So. 3d 386 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2013)
Barber v. Cornerstone Community Outreach, Inc.
42 So. 3d 65 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2009)
Young v. McLeod
841 So. 2d 245 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2001)
City of Birmingham v. Federation of City Employees
455 So. 2d 811 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1984)
Karagan v. City of Mobile
420 So. 2d 57 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1982)
Arrington v. State Ex Rel. Parsons
422 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1982)
Pruitt v. Pruitt
343 So. 2d 495 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976)
City of Birmingham v. Long
339 So. 2d 1021 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976)
Grant v. City of Mobile
282 So. 2d 285 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Bear Bros. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
123 So. 2d 596 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1960)
McDonald v. Lyle
121 So. 2d 885 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Sullivan v. Cheatham
84 So. 2d 374 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Francis v. Scott
72 So. 2d 93 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Cosby v. Moore
65 So. 2d 178 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1953)
Jones v. Crawford
62 So. 2d 221 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Mead v. Eagerton
50 So. 2d 253 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Howard v. Wilbur
166 F.2d 884 (Sixth Circuit, 1948)
Gelpi v. Tugwell
123 F.2d 377 (First Circuit, 1941)
Willis v. Buchman
199 So. 886 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 892, 240 Ala. 386, 132 A.L.R. 1179, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-buchman-ala-1940.