Willis v. Brune
30 F. App'x 682
Opinion
In these consolidated appeals, James Willis appeals from the district court’s1 orders denying his petition for a writ of mandamus and assessing a filing fee. Having reviewed the record, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition, see Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976), and properly assessed the filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willis v. Brune, 30 F. App'x 682 (8th Cir. 2002).
30 F. App'x 682 (Willis v. Brune) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.
426 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 1976)