Willis RE Inc. v. Herriott

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 10, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-00487·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ____________________________________ WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PUBLIC : LIMITED COMPANY AND WILLIS RE : INC., : Case No. 21-cv-00487 (JMF) Plaintiffs, : : v. : : JOINT CONFIDENTIALITY PAUL HERRIOTT, : AGREEMENT AND ORDER : Defendant. : ____________________________________: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties and any other persons or entities who become bound by this Order by signifying their assent through execution of Exhibit A hereto, including specifically non-party TigerRisk Partners LLC (“TigerRisk”),1 that the following Joint Confidentiality Agreement and Order (the “Order”) shall govern the handling of confidential and proprietary information produced by any party or by TigerRisk (the “Producing Party”) during this litigation, any related proceedings and/or appeals therefrom, if any (“the litigation”). 1. This Order applies to all information, documents, and things exchanged in or subject to discovery that are produced or otherwise provided in the litigation, either by a party or a non-party, to any other party or non-party, in response to or in connection with any discovery requests or subpoenas. 2. This Order applies to all non-parties producing documents or being deposed in connection with the litigation, and all such non-parties are entitled to the protections afforded hereby and subject to the obligations contained herein upon execution of Exhibit A hereto. 1 TigerRisk has already accepted service of subpoenas for documents and depositions from Plaintiffs. 3. In responding to a request for discovery or a subpoena, or offering a witness for deposition, the Producing Party may designate as “Confidential” any documents, information, or deposition testimony that it believes in good faith contain (i) non-public business information, including but not limited to financial information, personnel information, client information, or other proprietary business information or trade secrets, (ii) non-public personal information, or

(iii) information implicating a legitimate expectation of privacy concerning social security numbers, sensitive financial information, or other proprietary information. All of the foregoing categories of information are collectively referred to as “Confidential Material.” A Producing Party that designates material as “Confidential” is referred to as a “Designating Party.” 4. In responding to a request for discovery or a subpoena, or offering a witness for deposition, the Producing Party may designate as “Highly Confidential” any documents, information, or deposition testimony that it believes in good faith contain trade secrets or that would otherwise create a substantial risk of serious financial or other injury that cannot be avoided by less restrictive means. Such information is referred to as “Highly Confidential Material.” A

Producing Party that designates material as “Highly Confidential” is referred to as a “Designating Party.” 5. Any party or TigerRisk shall have the right to designate as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” documents or information provided by another party or non-party if the documents or information originated with or were created by the Designating Party, or contain Confidential or Highly Confidential Material, as defined herein, concerning the Designating Party. 6. The parties shall, in good faith, use Confidential Material and Highly Confidential Material solely for the purposes of preparing for and conducting the litigation, but for no other purpose. 7. The designation of material as Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material for purposes of this Order shall be made in the following manner: a. in the case of documents, exhibits, briefs, memoranda, or other materials (apart from depositions or other pretrial testimony): by stamping “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” on each page of any material containing any Confidential Material or Highly

Confidential Material; and b. in the case of depositions or other pretrial testimony: (i) by a statement on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Highly Confidential information, in which case the reporter will mark the relevant testimony as “Confidential [or Highly Confidential] Information Governed by Protective Order”; (ii) by stamping “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” on any page of the deposition transcript to be so designated and marking the cover of the transcript with “THIS DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL [or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL] MATERIAL” and providing a marked copy of the transcript to the other party within 5 business days after the transcript becomes available; or

(iii)in any manner agreed to in advance by both parties and, if applicable, TigerRisk. c. If there is disagreement as to the appropriateness of the requested designation, the parties and, if applicable, TigerRisk are required to follow the protocol set forth below in paragraph 8, with the “Producing Party” being the party requesting the designation of testimony as Confidential or Highly Confidential and the objecting party being the equivalent of the “Receiving Party.” 8. If the Receiving Party has an objection to a Confidential or Highly Confidential designation, the Receiving Party shall notify the Producing Party of its objection within 3 business days. The notification must be in writing and must detail the basis for such objection. After receiving the notification, if the Producing Party continues to believe that the information and/or documents should be designated Confidential or Highly Confidential, the Producing Party shall notify the Receiving Party within 3 business days of their continued disagreement and the Receiving Party shall then have 3 business days after sending this final notification (or a longer period of time if the parties agree or via Court Order) to seek an Order from the Court stating that

the material is not entitled to Confidentiality or High Confidentiality. The information and/or documents shall be treated as Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material pending a decision by the Court. 9. Once Confidential Material is produced, it may be disclosed, summarized, or otherwise communicated in whole or in part by the parties receiving said information only to the following persons, who may make use of such information only in connection with the litigation: a. Outside counsel who represent parties or TigerRisk in the litigation and in- house counsel for the parties and TigerRisk, only as necessary in connection with this litigation, and employees of counsel assisting in the conduct thereof for use in accordance with this Order,

only as necessary in connection with the litigation; b. Officers, directors, partners, or employees of any party or TigerRisk or their affiliates hereto who are performing duties in connection with this litigation, but only as necessary in connection with the litigation; c. Experts or consultants assisting the parties, but only as necessary in connection with the litigation; d. Potential or anticipated witnesses or deponents and their counsel, but only as necessary in connection with the litigation; e. The Court and its support personnel; and f. Court reporters employed in connection with the litigation. 10. Once Highly Confidential Material is produced, it may be disclosed, summarized, or otherwise communicated in whole or in part by the parties receiving said information only to the following persons, who may make use of such information only in connection with the litigation:

a. Outside counsel who represent parties or TigerRisk in the litigation and in- house counsel for the parties and TigerRisk, only as necessary in connection with this litigation, and employees of counsel assisting in the conduct thereof for use in accordance with this Order, only as necessary in connection with the litigation; b.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willis RE Inc. v. Herriott, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Willis RE Inc. v. Herriott (Willis RE Inc. v. Herriott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)