Willis, Owen Pascal
This text of Willis, Owen Pascal (Willis, Owen Pascal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,373-01
EX PARTE OWEN PASCAL WILLIS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 51582-C IN THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT FROM WICHITA COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of
aggravated robbery and sentenced to twenty-three years’ imprisonment on each count. He did not
appeal his convictions.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel failed to investigate Applicant’s
involvement in the robberies, particularly whether he was held at gunpoint and acted under duress.
Tex. Penal Code § 8.05. The State filed a response, but the trial court failed to make findings of fact 2
and conclusions of law.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim and describe her investigation of the charges.
The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions
of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial
but for counsel’s allegedly deficient conduct. The trial court shall also make any other findings of
fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s
claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. The plea papers shall also be
forwarded with the supplemental record. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: July 29, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Willis, Owen Pascal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-owen-pascal-texcrimapp-2015.