Willis Lansing Ganger v. United States
This text of 232 F.2d 884 (Willis Lansing Ganger v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal from a conviction upon a jury verdict of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, is grounded upon appellant’s contention, ably presented by court appointed counsel, that the district court was in error in not directing a judgment of acquittal upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction. A careful review of the record convinces us that the case was properly submitted to the jury, and that its verdict was sustained by substantial evidence.
The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 F.2d 884, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-lansing-ganger-v-united-states-ca6-1956.