Willis & Brown, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Willis & Brown, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

22 A.D.2d 867, 254 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2626

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 867 (Willis & Brown, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willis & Brown, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 22 A.D.2d 867, 254 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the State Liquor Authority canceling petitioner’s retail liquor store license, unanimously annulled, on the law, and the matter remanded to respondent with a direction to reinstate the license, without costs. The record fails to establish the charge that the licensee permitted another to avail himself of the license within the meaning of section 111 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law and the determination herein is not supported by substantial evidence. The attorney’s presence at the licensed premises was an incident of and consistent with legal measures to salvage a secured loan, the making and validity of which is undisputed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the State Liquor Authority canceling petitioner’s retail liquor store license, unanimously annulled, on the law, and the matter remanded to respondent with a direction to reinstate the license, without costs. The record fails to establish the charge that the licensee permitted another to avail himself of the license within the meaning of section 111 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law and the determination herein is not supported by substantial evidence. The attorney’s presence at the licensed premises was an incident of and consistent with legal measures to salvage a secured loan, the making and validity of which is undisputed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 867, 254 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-brown-inc-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1964.