Willinsky v. Fulton

79 Pa. Super. 148, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 202
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 13, 1922
DocketNo. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 79 Pa. Super. 148 (Willinsky v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willinsky v. Fulton, 79 Pa. Super. 148, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 202 (Pa. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The judgment1 was obtained in this case by the father of Albert Willinsky, Jr., for damages resulting from an injury to his son caused by an automobile collision. In an appeal by the defendant from the judgment in favor of the son, we held in an opinion this day filed that the question of the liability of the defendant was one of fact and, the jury having found against him, that the judgment should be sustained. It follows therefore that the appeal in the case of t'he father should be disposed of in like manner as the action turned on the question of the defendant’s negligence.

The judgment is affirmed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 Pa. Super. 148, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willinsky-v-fulton-pasuperct-1922.