Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Willingham v. State

Willingham v. State

939 S.W.2d 311, 327 Ark. 682, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 146
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 17, 1997
DocketCR 96-1222
StatusPublished

This text of 939 S.W.2d 311 (Willingham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willingham v. State, 939 S.W.2d 311, 327 Ark. 682, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 146 (Ark. 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, O.C. Willingham, by his attorney, Charles L. Honey, has filed an amended motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to an error on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
939 S.W.2d 311, 327 Ark. 682, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willingham-v-state-ark-1997.