Willingham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Willingham v. State

939 S.W.2d 311, 327 Ark. 682, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 146

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Willingham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 326 Ark. 468 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 17, 1997·No. CR 96-1222·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, O.C. Willingham, by his attorney, Charles L. Honey, has filed an amended motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to an error on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, O.C. Willingham, by his attorney, Charles L. Honey, has filed an amended motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to an error on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Willingham v. State, 939 S.W.2d 311, 327 Ark. 682, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 146 (Ark. 1997).

Pincite

939 S.W.2d 311 (Willingham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related