Willingham v. State

14 Ala. 539
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1848·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

CHILTON, J.

The writ of error in this case must be dismissed. There is no judgment against the defendant, from which a writ of error will lie; the error complained of is, that the court permitted the State’s solicitor to enter a nolle prosequi, so as to prefer a new indictment, corresponding with the facts constituting the alledged offence. The judgment of the court discharges the defendant from the former indictment, and if he was'improperly detained in custody .after the nolle prosequi was entered, this is not his remedy.

Writ off error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willingham v. State, 14 Ala. 539 (Ala. 1848).

14 Ala. 539 (Willingham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Shirley
106 So. 2d 671 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)
In Re Golib
130 N.E.2d 855 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1955)
Smith v. State
44 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)
Foster v. State
38 Ala. 425 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1863)