Willingham v. Criminal Term of Supreme Court
This text of 27 A.D.2d 991 (Willingham v. Criminal Term of Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding by petitioner pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit respondents from retrying him on indictment No. 384/66 and to direct that he be discharged insofar as he is held under that indictment. Proceeding dismissed, without costs. Petitioner was not placed in jeopardy, since the jury was dismissed prior to the introduction of evidence. Two motions, each by a separate respondent, to dismiss the proceeding. Motions dismissed as academic, in the light of the determination in [above] motion decided herewith. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 991, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willingham-v-criminal-term-of-supreme-court-nyappdiv-1967.