Willingham v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
SHERRI LYNN WILLINGHAM,
Plaintiff, Case No. 2:23-CV-01184-KCD v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant, /
ORDER Having obtained an award of benefits, Plaintiff’s counsel Carol Avard seeks attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 23.) Defendant does not oppose the relief sought. (Id. at 1.) Section 406(b) provides that an attorney who obtains a benefits award on remand may petition for a reasonable fee—not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant’s past-due benefits—for work performed before the court. Here, Attorney Avard requests $42,649.43, which is 25 percent of the past-due benefits awarded to Plaintiff. Attorney Avard further asserts that the previous EAJA award of $9,993.50 will be returned to Plaintiff. (Doc. 23 at 2); see Paltan v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 518 F. App’x 673, 674 (11th Cir. 2013) (noting that the attorney has the option of either refunding a prior EAJA award to the plaintiff directly or reducing the § 406(b) award by the same amount). For the reasons stated in Attorney Avard’s unopposed motion, the requested fee is both reasonable and appropriate under § 406(b). Accordingly, Attorney Avard’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Doc. 23) 1s GRANTED, and she is awarded § 406(b) fees of $42,649.43. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in this amount accordingly. Attorney Avard is further directed to return the previous EAJA award to Plaintiff within fourteen days of this order. ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on December 17, 2024.
i □ fe — le le L. Lael” © le C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willingham v. Commissioner of Social Security (Willingham v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.