Willingham v. Buncombe County Correctional Center

542 F. App'x 260
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2013·No. No. 13-6539·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles D. Willingham appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Willingham’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Willingham has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Will-ingham’s motion to appoint counsel and [261] affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willingham v. Buncombe County Correctional Center, 542 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2013).

542 F. App'x 260 (Willingham v. Buncombe County Correctional Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related