Willingham v. Buncombe County Correctional Center

542 F. App'x 260
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 2013
DocketNo. 13-6539
StatusPublished

This text of 542 F. App'x 260 (Willingham v. Buncombe County Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willingham v. Buncombe County Correctional Center, 542 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles D. Willingham appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Willingham’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Willingham has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Will-ingham’s motion to appoint counsel and [261]*261affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 F. App'x 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willingham-v-buncombe-county-correctional-center-ca4-2013.