Willinger v. Edgar

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Willinger v. Edgar

302 S.W.2d 364, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 184

DecidedMay 10, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 302 S.W.2d 364 (Willinger v. Edgar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willinger v. Edgar, 302 S.W.2d 364, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 184 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph M. Willinger et al., appellants, sought to recover $1,860 from appellees, Stewart E. Edgar et al., for damages to their truck. At the close of the plaintiffs’ testimony, a motion for a directed verdict in favor of the defendants was sustained.

The record has been examined, and we have concluded that the appellants failed to prove any negligence chargeable to the ap-pellees and the directed verdict was proper.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joseph M. Willinger et al., appellants, sought to recover $1,860 from appellees, Stewart E. Edgar et al., for damages to their truck. At the close of the plaintiffs’ testimony, a motion for a directed verdict in favor of the defendants was sustained.

The record has been examined, and we have concluded that the appellants failed to prove any negligence chargeable to the ap-pellees and the directed verdict was proper.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 S.W.2d 364, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willinger-v-edgar-kyctapp-1957.