Williford v. Haverty Furniture Co.
This text of 189 S.E. 521 (Williford v. Haverty Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A petition seeking to rescind a conditional bill of sale because of alleged fraudulent representations of the vendor as to the kind, quality, and condition of the personalty sold, to recover the portion of the purchase-money paid by the vendee, and for injunction, cancellation, and accounting, in which are set up no peculiar circumstances showing a necessity of interposition by a court of equity, such [708]*708as insolvency or non-residence of the vendor, is not maintainable in equity, as the plaintiff has an adequate and complete remedy at law.
2. The fact, that it is alleged that the vendor is threatening to transfer the conditional-sale contract to a third person does not afford any ground for equitable relief under the facts of this case.
3. The judge did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and in dismissing the petition on the ground that no cause for equitable relief was shown.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 S.E. 521, 183 Ga. 707, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williford-v-haverty-furniture-co-ga-1937.