Williford v. Haverty Furniture Co.

189 S.E. 521, 183 Ga. 707, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 385
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 14, 1937·No. No. 11506·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bussell, Chief Justice.

1. A petition seeking to rescind a conditional bill of sale because of alleged fraudulent representations of the vendor as to the kind, quality, and condition of the personalty sold, to recover the portion of the purchase-money paid by the vendee, and for injunction, cancellation, and accounting, in which are set up no peculiar circumstances showing a necessity of interposition by a court of equity, such [708] as insolvency or non-residence of the vendor, is not maintainable in equity, as the plaintiff has an adequate and complete remedy at law.

No. 11506. January 14, 1937.

2. The fact, that it is alleged that the vendor is threatening to transfer the conditional-sale contract to a third person does not afford any ground for equitable relief under the facts of this case.

3. The judge did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and in dismissing the petition on the ground that no cause for equitable relief was shown.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Ben O. Williford, for plaintiff. Harold Hirsch, Marion Smith, Hamilton Lolcey, and Ralph H. Pharr, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williford v. Haverty Furniture Co., 189 S.E. 521, 183 Ga. 707, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 385 (Ga. 1937).

189 S.E. 521 (Williford v. Haverty Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scarbrough v. Cook
69 S.E.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Wrenn v. Montgomery
198 S.E. 709 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)