Willie Thompson v. United States

897 F.2d 530, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3461, 1990 WL 25072
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 1990
Docket89-1700
StatusUnpublished

This text of 897 F.2d 530 (Willie Thompson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willie Thompson v. United States, 897 F.2d 530, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3461, 1990 WL 25072 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

897 F.2d 530

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Willie THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-1700.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 8, 1990.

Before WELLFORD and DAVID R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Petitioner, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his motion to vacate sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that the district court filed an order on May 30, 1989 dismissing the motion to vacate except for the issue regarding the $50.00 special assessment imposed. The court stayed its decision on that issue pending further action by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. Munoz-Flores, 863 F.2d 654 (9th Cir.1988), cert. granted, 110 S.Ct. 48 (1989). Petitioner appealed from that order.

Absent a Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification, an order disposing of fewer than all the claims or parties involved in an action is not appealable. See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 742-45 (1976); Solomon v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir.1986). No 54(b) certification was made in the instant case. Moreover, the final decision of the district court has not been entered during the pendency of this appeal; therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction. See Gillis v. Department of HHS, 759 F.2d 565, 569 (6th Cir.1985).

It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Wetzel
424 U.S. 737 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Solomon v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
782 F.2d 58 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. German Munoz-Flores
863 F.2d 654 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
897 F.2d 530, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3461, 1990 WL 25072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-thompson-v-united-states-ca6-1990.